|
|
Environment, Energy & Resources Law
Archives
Lastest Archives
| December 2004 |
 |
|
|
New Water Taking and Transfer Links (O.Reg. 387/04 takes effect January 1, 2005)
Watershed based source protection
reports
|
| |
|
|
|
| November2004 |
 |
|
|
November
2004- Municipal - Corporate Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf
format |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| September
2004 |
 |
|
|
Fall
2004- Municipal - Corporate Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf format
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Ontario
Court of Appeal: Minister Can 'Scope' Environmental Assessments
Appeal to SCC Means Uncertainty May Continue
|
| |
|
|
Ontario's
Court of Appeal has upheld the right of Ontario's Environment Minister
to tailor the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act
(EAA) to a particular project. This should remove the roadblock that had
paralyzed many EA projects since the June 2003 decision of the Divisional
Court in Sutcliffe v. Canadian Waste Services Inc. and MOE. Read
more |
| |
|
|
|
| July
2004 |
 |
|
|
Summer
2004- Municipal-Corporate Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf
format |
| |
|
|
New Brownfields Law October 1, 2004 But Mandatory
Clean-Up Postponed
Kingston Fisheries Act Conviction Means
Water Pollution Hard to Defend
Guide to
Ontario's New Legislation, Regulations, Consultations
|
| June
2004 |
 |
|
|
Brownfields
Amendments To Take Effect October 1, 2004 |
| |
|
|
Contaminated
Site Liability Limitations Available |
| |
|
|
Most of the contaminated site clean-up amendments to
the Environmental Protection Act, the Municipal Act, 2001
and several other laws will take effect October 1, 2004. These amendments
will allow property owners who clean-up contaminated property, and file
Records of Site Condition (RSC) to limit future liability for government
orders. The RSCs will be filed on a publicly accessible Environmental
Site Registry. However, important mandatory clean-up provisions triggered
by change of property use will not take effect until the government
decides to bring them into force at a later date.
The Brownfields package includes provisions that will
allow municipalities and the province to grant owners and developers
tax concessions as incentives to clean up and redevelop brownfield sites.
The MOE will publish the Record of Site Condition regulation
(O. Reg. 153/04) in the June 19 Ontario Gazette. The Record of
Site Condition regulation establishes four (4) categories of "qualified
person", each entitled to either certify levels of RSCs or conduct
risk assessments. Qualified persons signing RSCs will have to carry
a minimum $1,000,000 insurance, and for conducting Phase l ESAs and
certifying RSCs where no Phase ll ESA is required, must be a registered
member of one of the following regulated professions: professional engineer,
professional hydrogeologist, chartered chemist, professional agronomist,
certified engineering technologist, certified applied science technologist
or architectural technologist. Restrictions and experience requirements
apply to other classes for more complex assessments. Click
here to download the regulation.
|
| |
|
|
|
| May
2004 |
 |
|
|
Fisheries
Act Conviction Makes Water Pollution Charges Tougher To Defend
|
| |
|
|
Environmentalists,
Residents, MOE Succeed in Coordinated Fisheries Act Prosecution
|
| |
|
|
Fisheries
Act charges for water pollution will be harder to defend in the wake
of a May 2004 Ontario Court of Appeal decision. The Court upheld the conviction
of the City of Kingston for depositing a deleterious substance into water
frequented by fish. Evidence that landfill leachate killed rainbow trout
fingerlings in lab tests was enough to convict the City of the offence.
The Crown did not need to prove that the leachate would have been toxic
in the river, or that it would have killed the specific kinds of fish
that inhabit the river. The Court of Appeal stated that the Fisheries
Act pollution test is different from the test under the OWRA described
in the Court's decision in R. v. INCO (June 2001). Read
more |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Drinking
Water Relief
MOE Proposes Relief For Small Systems |
| |
|
|
Owners
and operators of small drinking water systems have been concerned about
the cost of complying with the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 and
regulations.
On May 12, 2004 the MOE posted a proposal to amend the
Drinking-Water Systems regulation (O. Reg. 170/03), to postpone a number
of deadlines for installation of treatment systems or commencing testing.
Read
more
|
| April
2004 |
 |
|
|
Spring
2004- Municipal-Corporate Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf
format |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Corporate
Criminal Liability Proclaimed
Westray Bill C-45 Now Law |
| |
|
|
Extended liability for individuals and organizations will affect operations
where accidents can harm public or workers
The Westray amendments to the Criminal Code (Bill C-45)
took effect on March 31, 2004. The amendments expand the scope of criminal
liability for negligence by companies, organizations and
individuals, where workers or members of the public are injured or killed.
Read
more
|
| February
2004 |
 |
|
|
Source Water Protection Planning Law - White Paper
Issued
|
| |
|
|
The
MOE published a White
Paper on Watershed-based Source Protection Planning on February
12, 2004. The White Paper provides a rough, conceptual proposal for legislation
that will require source protection plans to be developed regionally and
implemented locally for every watershed in the province. Read
more |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Mould Litigation: CCA Releases Canadian Guidelines
|
| |
|
|
The
Canadian Construction Association released Mould Guidelines For the
Canadian Construction Industry (CCA 82-2004) on February 16, 2004.
The CCA developed the Guidelines as a proactive measure, in recognition
of the significant number of legal claims in the U.S. The Guidelines deal
with insurance issues, health risks, construction practices, building
operations, mould assessment and remediation and demolition and disposal.
The publication also includes guidelines for selecting remediation contractors.
Download the Guidelines from the CCA website or here.
|
| January
2004 |
 |
|
|
Juli Abouchar of W&SEL Appointed To
Source Water Protection Implementation Committee
|
| |
|
|
On December
18, 2003 Minister of Environment Leona Dombrowsky announced the members
of the Expert Source Water Protection Committees. Willms & Shier Environmental
Lawyers is pleased to announce that W&SEL lawyer Juli
Abouchar was appointed to the Implementation Committee. Juli was Assistant
Counsel to the Walkerton Inquiry and devotes a significant portion of
her practice to environmental water and wastewater law. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Province Proposes Urban Sprawl Controls
Planning Act, Golden Horseshoe Moratorium and Bill
|
| |
|
|
In December, Ontario's Minister of Municipal Affairs
proposed important changes to the Planning Act that will have
retrospective effect across the Province. The Planning Act changes
will strengthen the power of municipal and provincial authorities to
control development, and restrict the power of the Ontario Municipal
Board (OMB). In addition, the Minister imposed a moratorium on land
use and introduced an important Bill to address urban sprawl in the
Golden Horseshoe. Read
more
|
| December
2003 |
 |
|
|
Winter
2003- Municipal-Corporate Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf
format |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Winter
2003- Special Municipal Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
pdf
format |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Planning
Act Controls Water Taking
Land Use Decision in Artemesia Case Stands |
| |
|
|
On December 9, 2003 water bottler Artemesia abandoned
its appeal of the Ontario Divisional Court decision that held that installing
pipes and pumps on land for the purpose of taking water is a 'land use'
under the Planning Act.
This means that the Divisional Court decision stands
as the current law of Ontario. Now communities who want to protect their
drinking water sources can control water taking through Official Plan
policies and zoning by-laws. Well-drafted land use controls will prevail,
even over MOE permits to take water.
For commentary and analysis, click
here. For full text of Grey Association for Better Planning v.
Artemesia Waters Ltd., click
here.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Divisional Court Limits Ottawa Hog Farm Conversion
Ottawa (City) v. Chief Building Official (Ottawa) Ontario
Divisional Court, released November 21, 2003 |
| |
|
|
This Divisional Court decision upholds the decision
of Superior Court Judge Roy, made on an appeal of the decision of Ottawa's
Chief Building Official to issue a permit to change dairy farm to an
intensive hog farm. The Divisional Court decision canvases in detail
the law on legal non-conforming uses, and on "other applicable
law" particularly in the context of livestock farms.
In the application decision, Judge Roy had decided
that the City had to issue the permit, but amended the permit to reduce
the number of hogs permitted. Judge Roy also found that the change from
dairy farm to hog farm meant that the hog farm would not be a legal
non-conforming use. Read
more
|
| November
2003 |
 |
|
|
Supreme Court of Canada
Imperial Oil Decision No Surprise
|
| |
|
|
The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision upholding
a Quebec environment ministry order against Imperial Oil comes as no
surprise. It will not promote legions of orphaned, fenced Brownfield
sites across the country, as some alarmists suggest. In fact, the decision
underscores the value to site owners of Ontario's coming Brownfields
amendments. When the new legislation takes effect, owners who clean
up, and those who buy from them, will be protected from most future
government clean-up orders.
When Imperial sold the property in 1979, it hoped to
dodge future liability by selling the property "as is". Environmental
legislation has evolved since then. Today, every well-advised vendor
ensures that responsibility for potential contamination is allocated
and secured by the Agreement of Purchase and Sale. Selling "as
is" does not limit vendor's exposure to government clean-up orders.
The decision does not break new ground. Provincial environment
ministries often make orders against former property owners to clean
up pollution caused by their historic operations. This decision is notable
because after Imperial sold the former petroleum depot, the purchaser
conducted a clean-up that was approved by the Quebec environment ministry,
who issued a certificate of authorization in 1987, allowing redevelopment
as a residential subdivision. Read
more
|
| October
2003 |
 |
|
|
Minister
of the Environment |
| |
|
|
The Honourable Leona Dombrowsky
Phone: 416-314-6790 Fax: 416-314-6748 Email: leona.dombrowsky@ene.gov.on.ca
Minister's Office
Ministry of the Environment
12th Floor, 135 St. Clair Ave. W
Toronto, ON M4V 1P5
The Minister is a native of Tweed and a graduate of
the University of Toronto. In 1985 she was elected as a trustee on the
Hastings and Prince Edward Roman Catholic School Board and served as
board chair from 1991-1996.
In 1998 she was elected to the newly amalgamated Algonquin
and Lakeshore Catholic School Board and became its first chair. As a
trustee she served at the provincial level as a director on the Ontario
Catholic School Trustees Association and she was also a member of the
Advisory Committee of the Education Quality and Assessment Office.
Elected as a Member of Provincial Parliament for Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox
and Addington in 1999, she was Deputy House Leader of the Ontario Liberal
Party, and was Liberal Critic for Community, Family and Children's Services.
Click here for
link to Ontario Cabinet October 2003.
|
| September
2003 |
 |
|
|
Environmental
Emergency (E2) Regulations Take Effect November 18, 2003 |
| |
|
|
Federal Environmental Emergency (E2) regulations under
CEPA 1999 will take effect November 18, 2003.
The regulations include a list of 174 substances that
may harm human health or environmental quality if released in an environmental
emergency, or act of terrorism or vandalism. For full text of the regulation
click here.
E2 Plan Requirements
Companies exceeding the thresholds for storage of any
of these substances, or having storage capacity exceeding the threshold
amounts, will have to:
- file information with Environment Canada;
- develop, implement and test Environmental Emergency
(E2) plans for each qualifying substance; and
- file confirming reports with Environment Canada.
Environment Canada has established an online reporting
site at https://cepae2-lcpeue.ec.gc.ca/index_en.cfm.
Environmental Emergency Reporting
The Anyone who causes or contributes to an environmental
emergency involving any E2 regulated substance is required to, as soon
as possible, notify a person designated under the E2 Regulations. In
Ontario, that means the MOE Spills Action Centre (1-800-268-6060). This
requirement applies to spills of any quantity of the E2 substance that
would be reportable as a spill under provincial law. For more information
on the oral and written reporting requirements, see the Implementation
Guidelines for Part 8 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act,
1999 Environmental Emergency Plans.
Read
more
|
| |
|
|
|
| August
2003 |
 |
|
|
Clock
rolled back on EAA |
| |
|
|
On June 17, 2003 the Ontario Divisional Court ruled
that the 1997 amendments to the EAA did not allow the Minister to limit
the scope of an environmental assessment, in Sutcliffe v. MOE and
Canadian Waste Services.
The Lawyers Weekly column by Barry Spiegel, Willms
& Shier Environmental Lawyers (July 25, 2003)
For more than a decade, large infrastructure projects
were plagued by a complex and uncertain approval process under Ontario's
Environmental Assessment Act (EAA). It was practically impossible to
get approval for new waste disposal sites. Municipalities engaged in
seemingly endless waste management master planning exercises, millions
of dollars were wasted on the unsuccessful Ontario Waste Management
Corporation (OWMC), the Interim Waste Authority debacle came and went,
the Hydro Demand Supply Plan hearings and the Timber Management Hearings
droned on for years.
Practically everyone agreed that the EAA process did
not work. The process was too demanding, complex, iterative and uncertain.
Private sector proponents argued that their projects were particularly
unsuited to the requirement for a full consideration of alternatives.
While municipalities could look at a wide range of sites (because they
could expropriate), private proponents are limited to lands they can
purchase economically. Read
more
|
| |
|
|
|
| July
2003 |
 |
|
|
Nutrient
Management Act, 2002 Proclaimed July 1, 2003 |
| |
|
|
Although the Act was proclaimed in effect July 1, 2003.
The regulation takes effect September 30, 2003 (O.Reg. 267/03). You
can download the regulation from our Compliance Centre. Protocols have
also been published for Construction and Siting; Local Advisory Committees;
Nutrient Management; Sampling and Analysis for Soil and Land Applied
Materials. The protocols are available through this link: http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/land/nutrient_management.htm
The government appointed a 20 person Advisory Committee.
Producers are very well represented on the Committee.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Summer
2003 - Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| May
2003 |
 |
|
|
Safe
Drinking Water Act, 2002 |
| |
|
|
Parts
of Ontarios Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 (SDWA) have been
proclaimed in force as of June 1, 2003.The SDWA establishes a statutory
standard of care for municipalities and corporations operating drinking
water systems, with personal liability for officers, directors and supervisors.
The lengthy Act significantly increases the red tape, resources and cost
required to establish and maintain drinking water systems. The Act does
not deal with protection of surface or groundwater resources - an advisory
committee is being struck for further consultation.
Five new regulations take effective on June 1, 2003
along with the SDWA. The new SDWDA regulations replace the safe drinking
water regulations for large and smaller water works that were passed
under the Ontario Water Resources Act in the wake of the Walkerton
tragedy.
The SDWA regulations
are:
| Drinking-Water
Systems Regulation, O.Reg. 170/03 |
|
- This is the main regulation, containing 24
schedules governing more than 8 defined types of regulated drinking-water
systems (see also O.Reg.
269/03)
|
|
Ontario
Drinking-Water Quality Standards Regulation, O.Reg. 169/03
|
|
- Lists the standards that apply to the required
tests in the Drinking Water Systems Regulation (see also O.Reg.
268/03)
|
| Definitions
of Words and Expressions Used in the Act Regulation, O. Reg.
171/03 |
|
- Includes definitions which apply to all regulations
under the SDWA and addresses the application of sections under
the SDWA (see also
O.Reg. 270/03)
|
| Schools,
Private Schools and Day Nurseries Regulation, O.Reg. 173/03 |
|
- Sets requirements for weekly flushing for schools,
private schools and day nurseries
|
| Definition
of "Deficiency" and "Municipal Drinking-Water Systems"
Regulation, O. Reg. 172/03 |
|
- Minister's regulation to define what a deficiency
is with respect to a drinking-water system and explicitly provides
that a drinking-water system that was established by a private
owner, but will be conveyed to municipal owner, is a municipal
drinking-water system for the purposes of the SDWA
|
| Compendium
to Drinking - Water Systems Regulation |
|
- MOE compendium summarizing intent and content
of regulations
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| March
2003 |
 |
|
|
Spring
2003- Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Brownfields
Clean-up Regs MOE Posts Publication Drafts |
| |
|
|
The MOE has published a draft regulation and proposed
clean-up standards to revamp Ontarios contaminated site clean-up
regime. The deadline for submissions is April 29th, 2003. Download the
regulation, the standards, the Compendium (MOEs brief explanation)
and the draft Analytical Methods and Risk Assessment guidance documents
from the Contaminated Sites section of our Online Compliance Centre.
Summary
The current, private-sector based clean-up framework
continues to minimize MOE involvement. Even after clean-ups are completed
and notice is filed on the Environmental Site Registry, new purchasers
and lenders will have to conduct their own environmental due diligence
neither the MOE nor the consultants who certify the Record of
Site Condition will be liable for mistakes. Read
more.
|
| |
|
|
|
| December
2002 |
 |
|
|
Fall/Winter
2002- Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Fall/Winter
Special Municipal Edition 2002- Special
Municipal Edition-Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| November
2002 |
 |
|
|
Contamination
Litigation
Tridan v. Shell Court of Appeal Decision Stands
Supreme Court of Canada Refuses Appeal |
| |
|
|
Owners of contaminated property in Ontario can successfully
recover damages from neighbouring polluters, even if the owners do not
intend to clean up the contamination. Courts may order damages based
on the costs of clean-up to a "pristine" state, a higher standard
than required by MOE clean-up guidelines. The stringent "pristine"
standard may be invoked even where the current land use is commercial
or industrial. On November 21, 2002 the Supreme Court of Canada refused
leave to appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Tridan
v. Shell.
Implications of Tridan:
- Owners do not have to sell or clean up to successfully
sue for damages.
- Damages for diminished property value will be based
on the best evidence available to the Courts - including estimated
cost to clean up and/or appraisal evidence of loss of value. The quality
of expert appraisal evidence will be a critical factor.
- Owners may also recover related financing and business
disturbance losses.
- In this case the court accepted evidence that the
property value may be reduced by stigma even after the property is
cleaned up to MOE standards; the court found that there was no evidence
of stigma after clean-up to 'pristine' condition.
- Prejudgment interest was not awarded on economic
loss for diminution of property value. (The Court of Appeal overturned
an interest award of $442,000).
Concerns:
- If the property is not cleaned up, can the polluter
avoid paying damages in a future lawsuit for the same contamination,
brought by a future owner?
- Will this decision undermine the regulated clean-up
standards coming soon under new Brownfields legislation? Read
more
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Brownfields
Proclamation of Municipality, Secured Creditor, Tax Sale Protection
Takes Effect December 1, 2002
No Date In Sight For Incentives, Development, Clean-up Provisions
|
| |
|
|
Provisions of the Brownfields
Statute Law Amendment Act, 2001 protecting municipalities and
secured creditors from liability are proclaimed in force effective December
1, 2002. These sections include amendments to the Environmental Protection
Act, the Ontario Water Resources Act, the Municipal Tax
Sales Act and the Planning Act. Two regulations, one under
the EPA
and one under the OWRA
will complement these new provisions. Read
more.
|
| |
|
|
|
| August
2002 |
 |
|
|
Summer
2002- Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law |
| |
|
|
W&SEL
Environmental Law and Compliance Training
Engagements
of Note
Congratulations
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Nutrient Management Act, 2002 Stage 1 Regulations
Published
On August 20 the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and
Food (OMAF) published Stage 1 regulations for consultation.
The Stage 1 draft regulations and protocols under
the Nutrient Management Act specify the content requirements
for nutrient management plans and strategies for prescribed agricultural
operations. They also propose categories of farm operations, and the
dates that new, expanding and existing operations in each category would
be required to have approved nutrient management plans and / or strategies.
Click here to download the Draft
Regulation, the Nutrient
Management Plan Protocol and the Nutrient
Unit Protocol.
|
| |
|
|
|
| July
2002 |
 |
|
|
Brownfields Regulations
MOEE Posts Municipal, Lender, Trustee Regulations For Consultation
On July 24, 2002 the MOEE posted the first two draft
regulations under the Brownfields Statute Amendment Law, 2001. Deadline
for comments is August 23, 2002. The draft regulation under the Environmental
Protection Act deals with municipalities, secured creditors, trustees
in bankruptcy and fiduciaries. The draft regulation under the Ontario
Water Resources Act deals with secured creditors, trustees in bankruptcy
and fiduciaries. Download the draft regulations from our Downloads Area, under the Brownfields/Contaminated Sites menu. (Read
more)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
W&SEL
Congratulates Essex Lawyers on New Law Firm Launch (Read
more)
|
| |
|
|
|
| June
2002 |
 |
|
|
MOEE To Review, Update Certificates of Approval
Protocols Posted for Updating Air, Wastewater (Sewage Works), Waste
Management, Water Works
On May 30, 2002 MOEE posted four protocols for reviewing
and updating Certificates of Approval. Reviews may result in demands
by MOEE for additional testing or data, filing of new or updated emissions
inventory, stricter emission and discharge limits, new monitoring or
reporting requirements, changes to standard operating procedures, and
inclusion of previously unapproved contaminant sources. Certificate
of Approval amendment fees will also be charged. Facilities with multiple
air approvals may be required to apply for site-wide air approvals ("Consolidated"
or "Basic Comprehensive").
Update reviews may be triggered in one of four ways:
- application for an amendment to an existing certificate
of Approval;
- MOEE may initiate a review based on findings from
an inspection or investigation;
- the facility is part of a targeted sector - for example
under STAC (Selected Targets for Air Compliance) or other MOEE program;
or
- in response to public request under the Environmental
Bill of Rights. (Read
more)
Download:
Protocol
For Updating Certificates Of Approval For Air Emissions
Protocol For
Updating Certificates Of Approval For Waste Management
Protocol For
Updating Certificates Of Approval For Sewage Works
Protocol For Updating
Certificates Of Approval For Drinking Water Systems
|
| |
|
|
|
| May
2002 |
 |
|
|
Spring
2002- Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
|
| |
|
|
The Courts
Municipalities
Legislation and Compliance
The Feds
Engagements of Note
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
JUNE 1, 2002 Deadline For Ontario Airborne Contaminant
Emission Reports - O. Reg. 127/01
Industrial and commercial companies, municipalities
and institutions in Classes A and B must file their first airborne contaminant
emissions reports by June 1, 2002.
The following article by Doug Petrie of Willms &
Shier Environmental Lawyers and Mark Vanderheyden of Rowan Williams
Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI) appears in the May 2002 issue of Environmental
Science & Engineering Magazine.
Ontario Regulation 127/01 became law on May 1, 2001.
The first annual reports are due on June 1, 2002. The regulatory requirements
include monitoring, record keeping and reporting on industrial, commercial
and institutional air emissions of some 358 airborne contaminants. In
addition to mandatory annual monitoring and reporting, some sectors
may also have to file reports for quarterly and smog season emissions.
This regulation has important consequences for companies
emitting reportable quantities of air contaminants. Reports will be
available to the public, and eventually may be posted on pollutionwatch.org.
Companies should ensure that reports are accurate and consistent with
other mandatory and voluntary information filings with federal and provincial
environmental authorities. Read
more
|
| |
|
|
|
| March
2002 |
 |
|
|
Supreme Court lets INCO case stand
MOE Investigators Need Probable Cause and Warrants to Search
The Supreme Court of Canada refused the MOE's application
for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeal's decision in the INCO case.
The Court of Appeal clarified the important distinction between inspection
conducted for abatement purposes and investigations intended to obtain
evidence to prosecute companies and individuals. Once a provincial officer
has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that an offence has been
committed, any subsequent search for evidence is an investigation that
must be conducted according to the Charter. For more details, click
here to read our commentary on the Court of Appeal decision (from
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers newsletter Summer 2001). |
| |
|
|
|
| February
2002 |
 |
|
|
Administrative Monetary Penalties Draft Regulations
Posted
Penalties Will Provide MOE With Compliance Leverage
The Ontario Ministry of the Environment has posted draft
Administrative Monetary Penalty regulations with lists of fines. There
are regulations for each of the EPA, the OWRA and the Pesticides Act.
Read
More |
|
|
|
|
| January
2002 |
 |
|
|
Tridan v. Shell: Appeal,
January 3, 2002
Court of Appeal Cuts $800K Off Tridan Damages - No Stigma If All
Contamination Cleaned Up
Ontario's Court of Appeal significantly reduced the amount
of damages that Shell Canada had to pay a neighbour for a gasoline spill
that contaminated the neighbour's commercial property. In its brief and
pragmatic decision, the Appeal Court held that a polluter must fully compensate
an injured party for all reasonable damages incurred by the pollution.
This may require compensation for clean-up to standards exceeding MOE
Guidelines. However, the damages must be reasonable and must be decided
based on the facts specific to the site, its use and marketability. Commentary
|
| December
2001 |
 |
|
MOE
Hazardous Waste Blitz - Flurry of Paper, But Most Regs To Be Phased In
(Faxflash) |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Hazardous Waste: Flurry of Regs, Proposals, Fees
For New Year
MOEs O.
Reg. 501/01 requiring annual generator registration for hazardous
and liquid industrial waste takes effect January 1, 2002. Generators must
register by February 15. Registration fees ($50 per report), manifest
fees ($5 per manifest) and tonnage fees ($10 per tonne of hazardous waste,
including waste disposed on-site) will apply. Generators must pay for
the first quarter of 2002 by March 15, 2002. See the Ministers
Requirement For Hazardous Waste Fees and Appendix 11 to the Registration
Guidance Manual For Generators of Liquid Industrial and Hazardous Waste
(December 2001) for payment requirements. Online waste tracking (HWIN
Hazardous Waste Information Network) is scheduled to go live on
February 26, 2002. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
PCB Proposed Reg Will Require Quick PCB Destruction
MOE published a proposed
regulation for 90 public consultation (to March 18, 2002) that will
require stored PCBs to be destroyed within three years of the passing
of the regulation. PCBs stored at sensitive sites (schools, hospitals,
parks, etc.) will have to be destroyed within one year of the passing
of the regulation. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Pre-Treatment Before Land Disposal Will End Ontario
Haz Waste Sanctuary
MOE published the discussion paper Pre-Treatment
Requirements For Hazardous Wastes Prior To Land Disposal on December
18th for 90 days of public consultation (deadline for submissions
March 18, 2002). MOE proposes to require Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR)
equivalent to those in the U.S., based on the U.S. EPA Universal Treatment
Standards (UTS). Imposing pre-treatment requirements equivalent to those
in the U.S. is intended to both discourage imports of hazwaste from generators
trying to avoid U.S. pre-treatment requirements, and reduce the amount
of hazardous waste generated in Ontario. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Winter 2001 - Municipal-Corporate/Industry
Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law - pdf
format
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
V. MacLean Q.C. Joins
Up
Court Upholds Livestock Cap
West Perth By-law Stands
Engagements of Note
|
Mandatory
P2 Planning Update
Toronto P2 Summaries Due
CEPA 1999-P2 Under Development
New Municipal Act - Royal Assent
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Toronto Pollution Prevention (P2) Plan Summaries Due
December 31, 2001
The Toronto Sewer Use By-law requires that businesses in
the following sectors prepare P2 Plans and file Plan Summaries by December
31, 2001: Read
More |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, 2001 Is Now
Law
The Act takes effect retroactively to November 16, 2001.
Royal Assent was given December 14, 2001. - Download the Acrobat version
here.
Visit the Ontario
Legislature page for Bill 122 for background information, press releases,
etc. |
| |
|
|
| October/November
2001 |
 |
|
Brownfields
Bill Passes - Implementation Will Take Time(Faxflash) |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Province Proposes
Building Code Administration Overhaul
On November 1, 2001 a new Bill called An Act to Improve
Public Safety and to Increase Efficiency in Building Code Enforcement
was introduced by Chris Hodgson, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
Intended to take effect in two years, the Bill would require many design
and inspection participants to meet prescribed levels of knowledge, require
builders to maintain prescribed levels of insurance, require municipalities
to meet time deadlines for building permit approvals, allow municipalities
to outsource plan review and inspections and limit building permit fees.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
MOE Updates Contaminated Site Liability Policy
On October 17th the MOE posted an update to its Compliance
Policy F-2 concerning liability of owners, former owners, landlords, mortgagees
and others to clean up or pay for remediation of contaminated sites. Read
More |
| |
|
|
 |
|
New Municipal Act, 2001 Bill 111
On December 12, 2001 Bill 111 the Municipal
Act, 2001 received Royal Assent. Download an Acrobat version here.
The new Act will take effect January 1, 2003. For more comments see Willms
& Shier Winter 2001 newsletter. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Fall 2001 - Municipal-Corporate/Industry
Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
- -pdf
format - - rtf
format |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Compliance/Enforcement
Air Reg. Update - Reporting
Fisheries Act Compliance Policy
ECO Report - Good Reading
The Courts
Pyke Odour Damages Upheld
Tridan appeal date set
SCC Nixes MTO Protection in Highway
Asphalt Dump Lawsuit
|
Contaminated
Sites
Brownfields Bill Update
Municipal Law
New Municipal Act To Rise Again
Municipal EMS Pilot
Nutrient Management Update
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Environmental Minister Witmer to Speak At Brownsfields
Conference
Willms & Shier is a sponsor, and
Marc McAree and
Doug Petrie will be presented at Managing Contaminated Land and
Brownfield Redevelopment presented by (AWMA-OS) and OSEM at the Waterloo
Inn in Waterloo Ontario on November 14 and 15, 2001. MOE Minister Witmer,
MMAH Deputy Minister, Robert Fung and more than 60 other experts will
be spoke on topics of vital interest to developers, municipalities,
planners and environmental professionals.
Willms & Shier lawyers are presented at a number of important conferences
in October and November. See our Conference
Calendar to download details.
|
| |
|
|
| September
2001 |
 |
|
Technical Standards and Safety Act and Regulations
New Codes/Higher Fines/Director's and Officer's Liability
In effect since June 27, 2001, the Technical Standards
and Safety Act 2000 consolidates inspectors powers to make orders
and seek enforcement under regulations and Codes for fuel storage and
handling, propane equipment and boilers and pressure vessels. The new
Act is administered and enforced by the privately-run Technical
Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA).
Directors and officers are now exposed to prosecutions
for failing to take all reasonable care to prevent the corporation from
committing any offence under the Act or regulations. The penalty for
directors and officers is a maximum of a $50,000 fine and one year imprisonment.
Corporate maximum fines have been increased to $1 million.
An awkward complex of regulations, Code adoption documents
and Codes replaces the old system. To ensure compliance each regulation,
the Code adoption document and Code must be checked. For example, several
of the Code adoption documents contain specific exemptions or amendments
to Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Codes. Commentary.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Fisheries Act Habitat and Pollution Compliance Policy
Consultation
Environment Canada has released the Compliance
and Enforcement Policy for the Habitat Protection and Pollution Provisions
of the Fisheries Act for consultation. The consultation period ends
October 30, 2001. You can download the consultation draft here.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Clear Language Transportation of Dangerous Goods
Regulations
Regs Come Into Force August 15, 2002
New Clear Language TDGA Regulations
have been finalized, and will take effect on August 15, 2002. The Regulations
were published in Canada Gazette Part II on August 15, 2001. The
one-year delay is intended to allow companies to deplete inventories of
existing forms and to update employee training to comply with the regulations.
The regulations are available online at the Transport
Canada site. |
| |
|
|
| August
2001 |
 |
|
Summer 2001 - Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter
- Willms & Shier Environmental Law
Court of Appeal Says MOE Investigators
Need Warrants
Supreme Court Turbocharges
Municipal Powers
Livestock Agriculture and Nutrient
Management
Bill 81 - Nutrient Management
Act
pdf
format
rtf
format
|
| July
2001 |
 |
|
Cutting
Red Tape for Haz Waste Generators - NOT - see Witmer Press Release(Faxflash) |
| |
| June
2001 |
|
|
|
Nutrient Management
Act, 2001 Introduced
|
| |
|
On June 13 OMAFRA
Minister Brian Coburn introduced Bill 81 for First Reading. Click here to download the Acrobat
version (.pdf).
As currently drafted, the Act is mainly procedural. It would rely on a
multitude of regulations to set the standards for nutrient management
plans and practices. Commentary |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Spring 2001
- Municipal-Corporate/Industry Newsletter - Willms & Shier Environmental
Law
| COMPLIANCE / ENFORCEMENT |
CONTAMINATED SITES |
Online Compliance: W&S Site
Ontario Ups Enforcement
Air - Monitoring / Reporting Reg.
Air - Standards / Risk Mgmt
Air - New Dispersion Models
Due Diligence: MacBlo Succeeds
Pollutionwatch.org
|
Brownfields Bill No Quick Fix
Tridan Appeal In Works
|
| MUNICIPAL LAW |
Development Permits Coming
Nutrient Management
West Perth Appeal
Legislation Coming?
|
| pdf
format |
|
| rtf
format |
|
|
| May
2001 |
 |
|
Brownfields Bill Released |
| |
|
First reading of the complex
Bill 56 - Brownfields Statute Law Amendment
Act, 2001 was tabled in the Legislature
on May 17, 2001. - Commentary |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Oak Ridges Development Freeze |
| |
|
Oak
Ridges Moraine Protection Act, 2001(Bill 55) was passed in the Legislature on May
17, 2001. The Act will freeze development on the Moraine for six months. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
MOE
Airborne Monitoring and Reporting Regulation Now Law - Industries,
Municipalities Must Track, Report On 358 Substances (Faxflash) |
| |
|
The New Regulation, Guide
and supporting documents are posted in the Willms & Shier Compliance
Centre. |
| April
2001 |
 |
|
Pollutionwatch Site Goes Live |
| |
|
Canadian environmentalists posted
a new site http://www.pollutionwatch.org that
allows members of the public to get information on the quantities of pollutants
released by companies in their communities. The data from the 1999 NPRI
is processed and presented in a simplified series of graphs, ranking companies
on the basis of cancer and noncancer risks, toxic risks (liver, neurotoxicity,
etc.) and the rank of the company for general pollution.
The site designers have focussed on air and water releases for risk ranking.
One criticism in past of NPRI data was that responsible companies with
up-to-date onsite waste disposal practices were disproportionately penalized
when landfilled waste was lumped together with potentially more harmful
air and water releases.
Companies, and communities will be startled by the stark characterizations
delivered by this electronic reinterpretation of the NPRI data. The site
is the work of the Canadian Environmental Law Association, Canadian Institute
for Environmental Law and Policy and the Canadian Environmental Defence
Fund. Additional funding came from several private organizations. |
| |
|
|
| March
2001 |
 |
|
Ontario MOE Moves Air Emissions
Regulatory Program Forward |
| |
|
In March 2001 MOE posted a number
of regulatory proposals and new standards on the Environmental Registry.
- Commentary |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Welcome Brownfields Changes
Coming - MMAH Issues Sketchy Details Commentary |
| |
|
|
| February
2001 |
 |
| | |